often happens in journalism as drink: the worst is mixed. There are obvious examples of bad journalism. So bad that even the justice, prosecutors are interested in their practice and that no further specific institutions dedicated to different content. A false journalism in which anything goes and that is so bad that flagrantly violates the law. With that journalism should not mix anyone professionally honored. What we are witnessing these days with the media circus that Telecinco has mounted about the trial of the case "Mari Luz." Paul Vassil, Ana Rosa Quintana (writer of a novel false plagiarized copy and paste) or Jordi González have nothing to do with journalism. They are crooks able to take advantage of a mentally handicapped to get what they call an exclusive, as if a unique (in this case or that ever) be justified by itself no matter what and the how. Are capable of that and of course, to make a good man as the father of Mari Luz in a pathetic character based on mixing his pain and poverty with the money, in this case 45,000 thousand euros, which they pay. They make a product impossible to see from a minimally conscious of evil and from decency. Therefore it is unacceptable that journalists like Charles Butcher (I've seen today), so fine analyst when speaking of Libya, democratic regeneration or political management of our governments, whether these programs palm Telecinco. Their presence is alibi of scoundrels, their reflections were intended to disguise the smell of sewage. His silences are complicit. No highlight Vassil bad journalism, or González Quintana, his contempt for human dignity is to be like them. The money does not justify everything. What will Butcher, whether between theme and topic brainy brainy, Angels Barceló in the SER, proposed as a debate the media treatment of "Mari Luz case?
0 comments:
Post a Comment