That there is the possibility of reason on a particular topic does not entitle anything about who may not have it. Nothing. There are people who reached a certain level, should not be taken seriously. The journalist Arcadi Espada is one of those people but sometimes it may be appropriate to discuss any of their actions by the consequences they may have for others.
Yesterday in the newspaper "El Mundo" published an article Sword in the supposedly defending the honor of the writer Javier Cercas who, as pointed out, a television had been related to a raid on a brothel. Now it turns out that almost never was there, that nothing was true. It turns out that sword, presumably, wanted to expose that fiction is not well introduced in a newspaper article. For months, Fences, against the advice of Espada, who maintains long-standing differences, defended the possibility of mixing fact and fiction in an article . Did in relation to a letter from the academic Francisco Rico , after protesting the various prohibitions that persecute smokers, non-smoker stated when, in fact, smoke compulsively. In its day Reader Advocate "El País" already referred to the controversy.
Espada's response was this article that puts fences in a brothel in which he was not. Today in the "Cadena Ser" the philosopher Manuel Delgado defended that may lie Sword added nothing to the usual lies of the media. Such an interpretation deserves a response. It seems very foolish to maintain that everything is equal, the magnitudes do not matter, that the results of things have no value. Lying is one thing, if done in a medium of communication and no warning is overtly wrong, but to slander a person, harm is another thing, and worse. Can not be the same jump a red light at three in the morning on a empty road to take you through a quiet pedestrian street, ignoring the red light, go for it at full speed and stop sweeping. It is not like selling oil sell adulterated with water mixed with bleach. This is útlimo and one example, which made Espada. Can not be accepted. Arcadi Espada, once made interesting journalism, has lost its interest for him, so many lessons taught journalism, has forgotten one basic question: journalists can not be the star of his own work, can not be what gives meaning to work. If the facts are not certain there is no journalism. Knowingly lie and leave victims is unacceptable in journalism. It is not simply a matter of professional conduct, prohibited by law. The problem is that his ego can Espada. So much that it has pushed out of the profession to place in the entertainment field. To understand more or less, where the pundits of the trash TV.
0 comments:
Post a Comment